Armenian
News Network / Groong
Conversations on Groong: Talking with Alison Tahmizian Meuse
Hello and welcome to the
Armenian News Network, Groong, In this Conversations
on Groong episode, we’ll be talking with a veteran journalist who has
recently shifted gears, and also moved to the homeland.
This episode was recorded on Monday, November 15, 2021.
We have with us
Alison Tahmizian Meuse, who is a graduate of the
George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs. She
is a French and Arabic speaker, and a veteran Middle East journalist, having
worked over the past decade as a producer, correspondent and editor for major
international publications including Agence France-Presse, NPR, and the Asia
Times. She currently serves as a strategic advisor for the New Delhi-based
consultancy DeepStrat and is newly based in Yerevan. |
|
So
in your decade-long professional journey, you’ve covered some important aspects
of the Arab Spring. For example, you covered the Egyptian uprising, the Syrian
civil war, the rise of the Islamic State, the Lebanese financial collapse and the Beirut explosion.
Can you tell us what drove
you to be a journalist in the first place, and then also, what drove you to
these dangerous scenes of international conflict?
●
Evans episode
●
Cairo, AFP learning the basics
●
Immersion in the language and society
●
Applying my background to the job
You are an Armenian-American,
how did you end up in Yerevan?
●
Office, or homeland?
●
Coverage of war and peace in Armenia, and
effects on the new generation.
●
A place where global media outlets can establish
a base
Let’s turn our attention to
our region. Can you tell us how you experienced the War in Artsakh last year? In particular we want to hear your thoughts about the media
coverage of the conflict. Were you in Armenia at the time? Were you working for
a media organization?
What are your thoughts about
western media coverage of the war?
●
… Azerbaijani money and how it affects media
coverage?
●
… Is your Armenian identity an asset or
liability when you want to cover the region?
●
… How prevalent is “both-sidism”
in editorial policy?
●
… Azerbaijani money and how it affects media
coverage?
You have a large following on
Twitter, and you regularly tweet about your areas of interest and expertise.
●
What has been your experience on Twitter as a
platform for sharing news and political analysis?
○
Twitter is the only place where you can actually
call out a high-level official or organization and get a response. With print
media dying out, letters to the editor have lost a lot of their reach. And you
have comments sections, but those can be monopolized by fake accounts and
sometimes they are even shut down. And if you look at some of the supposedly prestigious
platforms for publishing articles advocating policy, say Carnegie, you don’t
even have a public venue for feedback. You’re reduced to email, a stonewall
that exists to protect itself and its people. So
twitter is the place where you can actually call things out when they’re wrong,
and get backup from respected names that may be halfway around the world.
●
What do you use Twitter for, philosophically
speaking?
The Armenian community on
Twitter has been very divided since the war. By now we know this is not an
Armenian phenomenon, but more likely social media shrinking the global village
and amplifying polarizations, while dampening or muting areas where people find
understanding and common ground.
●
How has this affected your experience as a
journalist reporting in a world of conflict?
○
Not necessarily polarized but there are some
very loud voices trying to censor anyone critical of what is happening in
Armenia today.
●
What about specifically Armenian news, and the
coverage of the war?
This year has seen the Armenian government enact
a number of laws that they say are meant to be anti-defamatory
or anti-slander, by raising penalties on insults and defamatory statements. The
reality has been greater opacity in reporting on government and parliamentary
affairs, and a decline
in Internet freedom in Armenia. International organizations like Freedom
House were widely reported
as they slammed the Pashinyan’s government for these
laws, saying
that they “degrade the norms of democracy” in Armenia.
●
As a journalist, what are your impressions about
these recent changes to Armenian law to restrict media?
●
As a reporter, how would such a law factor into
your work? And have you encountered such circumstances in the past?
●
What has been your experience with such laws in
reporting from other countries in the region?
What are your plans in the coming year?
That concludes this Conversations On
Groong episode, and we hope you
found it helpful. As always we invite your feedback,
you can find us on most social media and podcast platforms, or our website Groong.org.
Thanks to Laura Osborn for
the music on our podcasts. Don’t forget to subscribe to our channel on Youtube, Like our pages and follow us on social media. On behalf of
everyone in this episode, we wish you a good week, thanks for listening and
we’ll talk to you soon.
●
Facebook Group: Groong - Armenian News Network
●
Facebook Page: ANN - Groong
●
Youtube: Armenian
News Network - Groong
●
Twitter: @groong
●
Telegram: Armenian News Network - Groong
●
Reddit: r/Groong
●
Instagram: ANNGroong
●
Website: Groong.org
●
Podcasts: Apple, Google, Spotify, and more.
Search your preferred Podcast platform!
Alison Meuse, Journalism, Armenia, Media Freedom, Artsakh War, Middle East, defamation, Twitter, Harassment, Internet Freedom,